Close X

Orange County Real Estate CEO Sentenced to 14 Years in Prison for Fraud Scheme that Ended in $169 Million Bankruptcy

Posted by Fay Arfa | Mar 02, 2016 | 0 Comments

SANTA ANA, California– The owner and CEO of a now-defunct Southern California real estate investment firm was sentenced today to 168 months in prison for perpetrating a scheme that ended with the bankruptcy of the company and hundreds of investors collectively losing as much as $169 million.

Michael J. Stewart, 68, of San Clemente, received the 14-year sentence from United States District Judge Cormac J. Carney, who also ordered the defendant to pay $9,234,914 in restitution to 120 victims.

Following a nine-day jury trial before Judge Carney, Stewart was found guilty in August 2015 of 11 counts of mail fraud. Stewart was remanded into custody at that time.

Stewart owned and was the chief executive of Pacific Property Assets (PPA), which had offices in Long Beach and Irvine. Along with co-defendant John Packard, Stewart created PPA in 1999 to purchase, renovate, operate, and resell or refinance apartment complexes in Southern California and Arizona. Typically, PPA financed property acquisitions through mortgages, and it raised money from private investors to pay for renovations to the properties. After several years, PPA would refinance (or sometimes sell) each property.

Although PPA's apartment rental operations were not profitable, the company was able to raise cash through refinancing and selling properties. As real estate values were generally increasing until approximately 2007, the properties were refinanced at ever-higher values, which enabled PPA to use the extra refinancing proceeds to not only pay off the original mortgages, but also to make payments on other loans, make payments to investors, to pay other business expenses, and to pay Stewart and Packard.

When the real estate market collapse and credit dried up, Stewart and Packard turned to fraud to prop up their failing company and to continuing earning their large salaries. They engaged in what was nothing more than a Ponzi scheme that ultimately collapsed.

“While all investments carry some risks, victims who were lured into this scheme in 2008 and 2009 faced a guaranteed loss of their funds,” said United States Attorney Eileen M. Decker. “Investors are entitled to know how their money is being spent and the true financial state of a company, but Mr. Stewart did everything in his power to conceal the truth. His fraudulent conduct has earned him the lengthy prison sentence handed down today.”

In its 10 years of operation, PPA acquired more than 100 real estate properties and raised hundreds of millions of dollars from hundreds of investors. As Stewart told prospective investors, from 2004 to 2007, PPA was named three times to Inc. magazine's list of the fastest growing privately held companies in the United States, was a regional finalist in Ernst & Young's Entrepreneur of the Year Program, and was listed by the Orange County Business Journal as one of fastest growing businesses in Orange County.

But as the government argued at trial, by the end of 2007, when the real estate market began to decline and credit became scarce, PPA's business model was no longer feasible. As the value of PPA's properties was falling, PPA could no longer raise money by refinancing its properties with larger mortgages or selling properties at a profit. Furthermore, PPA faced large debt payments to its mortgage lenders and private investors, while it was continuing to lose money in its business operations. In May 2008, PPA's controller warned Stewart and Packard that without a new source of funds, PPA faced losing as much as $2 million dollars per month, and emails between the owners revealed that they projected that trend to continue.

To keep PPA afloat, from early 2008 through April 2009, Stewart and Packard raised more than $34 million dollars from new investors, many of them elderly and retired persons who were investing their retirement funds in the company. For example, one 74-year-old investor testified at trial that in early 2009, shortly after her husband passed away, Stewart's staff persuaded her to invest virtually all her retirement savings in PPA.

The defendants used those new funds to pay earlier investors, mortgage lenders, other company expenses, and Stewart and Packard themselves – including annual salaries for the two co-owners of $750,000 and hundreds of thousands of dollars in additional compensation. Packard testified at trial that in 2008, he and Stewart knew that PPA was dependent on these investor loans to make its monthly debt payments and continue operating, and was unable to raise money through other means. PPA's former Director of Investor Relations further testified that during that period, Stewart began to pressure her and others to raise more money from investors.

Evidence introduced at trial also showed that Stewart misrepresented PPA's financial condition by claiming that its business model was still working, and that PPA was still financially stable and able to raise money through refinancing. In particular, Stewart created and provided to investors fraudulent financial statements, claiming that PPA had made millions of dollars in income in the first half of 2008 when the company had actually lost millions. Stewart also arranged with Packard to temporarily deposit $2 million dollars into a company bank account to make the company's cash position look stronger for investors – money that was quickly withdrawn from the account without reflecting the withdrawal in the balance sheet given to investors. Stewart and Packard also concealed from investors the fact that the business had effectively become a Ponzi scheme, using funds from new investors to pay back earlier investors.

In the last investor offering in early 2009, known as the Opportunity Fund, Stewart told investors that their funds would be used to purchase new real estate properties. In fact, none of the more than $9 million raised was used for that purpose.  Instead, the money was used to pay earlier investors and banks, to pay Stewart and Packard, and to pay PPA's bankruptcy attorney. Stewart continued to raise money from investors until late April 2009, when he abruptly informed investors that PPA was suspending their monthly interest payments. Several investors testified at trial that even in mid-April 2009, after PPA had begun to default on some of its bank and investor loans, Stewart personally solicited investments from them in the Opportunity Fund, claiming that PPA was financially sound and their funds would be used for new real estate projects.

PPA and a group of related companies filed for bankruptcy in June 2009. When the bankruptcy was filed, PPA stated that it owed 647 private investors more than $91 million, and it owed banks approximately $100 million. The Chapter 11 trustee appointed in the bankruptcy case later estimated the total investor losses at $169 million, and predicted that investors would receive, at best, “pennies on the dollar” through the bankruptcy process.

As the government stated in a sentencing brief filed with the court, Stewart “acted deliberately and repeatedly in misleading hundreds of people into entrusting their retirement savings to him, and the outcome for many was nothing less than devastating.”

PPA co-owner John Packard pleaded guilty to one count of mail fraud in November 2014 and cooperated with the government. He is scheduled to be sentenced by Judge Carney on March 28.

This investigation was conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which received assistance from the United States Trustee's Office and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

USAO – California, Central Updated March 1, 2016

Central District of California DOJ / 16-040 / February 29, 2016

About the Author

Fay Arfa

Fay Arfa has the distinction of being Certified as a Specialist in two separate areas of law – Criminal Law as well as Appellate Law – by the California State Bar, Board of Specialization. The National Board of Trial Advocacy has also awarded her a board Certification in Criminal Trial Advocacy. ...


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Board Certifications

Contact Us Today

Fay Arfa is committed to answering your questions about Trials, Appeals, Habeas Corpus, State Crimes, Federal Crimes, and Sex Crimes law issues in California.

We offer a free telephone consultation and we'll gladly discuss your case with you at your convenience. Contact us today to schedule an appointment.